Saturday, January 19, 2008
The Human Side?
In 2005, the Hadassah Medial Center in Jerusalem, Israel was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize due to its equality in treatment, its ethnic and religious diversity, and its efforts to build bridges to peace. On my last trip to Jerusalem, I stayed with a Bolivian couple. They lived in an apartment complex next to the hospital that gave discount rates to patients. In the lobby milled sickly, skinny, bald residents, or pale children, their lips aseptically hidden behind blue masks.
It is a microcosm where death is present in every action, and risky procedures are debated over coffee. The Bolivian couple sighed over how many friends they had lost this year. During my stay they treated Nigerian guests. The boy was 24 with gorgeous, brown eyes and leukemia. He had never been sick a day in his life. He missed Africa and was returning home as soon as he could to await a match. While his brother, who had accompanied him, enjoyed the night life in Tel Aviv, he had trouble walking down the stairs. His frailty was visible through his sweat pants as he melted into the couch. He remained silent, his eyes drifting, while his mother discussed his bone marrow transplant.
Both the Bolivian couple and the Nigerian family had chosen Hadassah after being left without other options. The Bolivian girl had spent a year in Peru and was near death. Hadassah was the cheapest hospital and the most willing to perform experimental procedures. Neither patients had much money to spare. But the Nigerian woman said it best, "it doesn't matter the cost, you'll pay if it's your life."
Because of her treatment, the Bolivian woman had finally, miraculously lapsed into remission. The couple was leaving for home the next day. As they spoke of the ethnic conflicts in Bolivia, their city, Cochabamba, that they had to defend from "indigenous" rebels with sticks and rocks, the men they saw fall dead at their feet, the hate they experienced from those they considered fellow country men, it was obvious they did not wish to leave Jerusalem. The Bolivian man had taken me and my friend around the old city, to the significant Catholic sites, and spoke with affection for Jerusalem. He had found a people in Israel who had helped his love to live.
Living in America can mean that your spheres of influence are largely pro-Israeli. The media does a piss-poor job of unbiased coverage. Whether this is because there is some kind of Zionist conspiracy (i.e. Zionist owned media corporations) or, what I believe to be more likely, a complex and multi-faceted problem, which constrains journalists, such as a lack of historical knowledge, cultural acceptance, time to fact check and space for true analysis, a pressure for constant and easy news, a reader's short attention span and ultimately, the corruption of capitalism. One should never forget the news is a product. It is sold for consumption. And in the end, terrorism is sexy. Sex sells. In America, it seems easier to label an Arab as a terrorist than a Jewish holocaust survivor. But far worse, it is the tendency to create these terms such as "terrorist" that deny the labeled of context.
I'll admit that as a young person, learning about the Sbarro suicide bombings in Jerusalem in 2001, I was horrified by these acts of "terrorism". However, as I grew older, and was influenced by international experience and liberal ideology, my mind broaden to consider the reasons for such acts of desperation. Now on my fifth visit to Palestine and anticipating more, I am finding myself struggling in the other direction, to open my mind to how Israeli's could be drawn to commit such acts of terror.
I had wanted to visit a Jewish settlement on this visit. However, I was unsuccessful in finding the time and the means. I would love to visit Har Homa, an illegal settlement creeping like a virus onto Bethlehem's land, to discuss with a settler the infection that is a constant reminder as it fills the horizon, the view from the windows of Bethlehem.
But my experience with the Hadassah patients has helped to, in some small way, humanize Jerusalem for me, to remind me that a government is not the equivalent of its people, that perhaps there is hope that if a hospital can be renown for its equality, then perhaps this equality can extend to its Arab neighbors.
* Pictures of Bush's visit to the Old City
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
"Whether this is because there is some kind of Zionist conspiracy (i.e. Zionist owned media corporations) or, what I believe to be more likely, a complex and multi-faceted problem...."
Well, duh. I'm pretty offended you mentioned the "Zionist conspiracy" as an actual possibility.
heh, don't rule it out yet Joshua;) They've got some damn powerful lobbists...
I saw you in Al's Florida pictures. You looked fantastic! Have you been working out?;)
Thanks Kim!
Huh....if our control of the media was that powerful, then someone will have to explain to me how Fox News and Rush Limbaugh got on the air :-)
Well, it's all about who owns the media right? So the argument would be ultra rich conservatives own the media and censor it or shape it to their favor, which would then make complete sense why Fox News and Rush Limbaugh got on the air. I think the Zionist conspiracist would say that either Zionists or Zionist-supporting Jews own the big corporations like Time Warner, or pay the corporate owners not to print anything negative. The problem is that there IS massive amounts of control over the media by a very few, which are getting more and more consolidated all the time. So things happen like Disney owns ABC or Rupert Murdoch owns Fox News and Wall Street Journal and I'm sure these sources get censored by the those with vested monetary interests.
So, while I'm not arguing the Zionist conspiracy theory, I wouldn't complete write it off. I just don't know enough about the interests/history,et. of the owners now.
Hmmm...
Except the "Zionist conspiracy" of mythology are not ultra rich conservatives. They are ultra rich, secretive liberals bent on destroying capitalism and Christianity and banning apple pie.
I understand where you're getting at when you talk about corporate ownership of the media, censorship of views that don't agree with the owners, etc. and I agree with some of it.
What I really am offended by is the phrase "Zionist Conspiracy". To myself and many Jews those words have a definite anitsemitic undertone, and a belief in a very specific conpiracy that purports that not only do Jews and Freemasons run the world, but that they also drink the blood of Christian babies.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Protocols_of_the_Elders_of_Zion).
So I can only ask that you please be careful how you use that phrase. To many, it implies something much, much more insidious than just influence or control of the media.
I hear you, the term is definitely loaded. And I understand your offense, which I apologize for and I appreciate that you voiced your concern. I don't usually subscribe to ideas of conspiracy as it tends to simply a complex situation, my confusion though is why Zionist is automatically antisemitic. Not all Jews are Zionist, correct? And other religions can subscribe to Zionism, like a Christian Zionist. I think one of the main problems of the Israel/Palestine discussion is that all too often, people pull out the term antisemitic and suddenly the issue can no longer be discussed. While the term is controversial, so are certain beliefs of Zionism, which are having drastic and horrific consequences on Palestinians. I don't believe the term Zionist Conspiracy was used without care, but it is an honest belief of some people. And no concept should be closed to discussion. However, I apologize if you're offended by the term. I would be interested to learn more about the ultra liberalness of Zionists, as I don't know all that much about Zionism except it's belief that the Jews should return to the holy land. And before I start throwing around terms, I should most definitely be better read and knowledgeable, which is a fault on my part. I would also be interested to know your views about the situation. I believe the more discussion the better, and I have a fairly one-sided view here so it is great to get a different perspective.
I would also like to state for the record that I am not against Zionism, I am against what the Israel government is doing to Palestinians.
Post a Comment